Mary Finnegan has a new book about David Bowie called the Psychedelic Suburbia: David Bowie and the Beckenham Arts Lab.
You can read it in about two hours. It’s all about who was there, who was who and leaves one with the feeling of who cares. Well, aficionados of David Bowie will care and read it, particularly now that he is dead, and young people into his music, and the idea of a “fluid” self as a life choice. So will those curious about the “sex, rock and roll” and early drug scene in the sixties. A pretty large and marketable crowd.
What is interesting is that in Mary’s blog post, in 2013, in the archives at her website Flower Raj, she reveals her reason for writing: to expose the”horror stories” and “dark side, the very dark side” of Tibetan Buddhism because of corrupt Tibetan lamas, she says, and the naiveté of old flower children like Mary.
In this post she notes that she had become a “one-woman activist” exposing Lama Sogyal and his corruptions and the shadow side of Tibetan Buddhism which she knew well. Mary did become a one woman activist and she did expose Sogyal, the predator Tibetan lama , relentlessly, in article after article in the British Guardian. Mary had been in Lama Soygal’s inner circle for years. She was even one of his older, female students who ‘pimped” for him finding young and naive women to join his Lama harem. Unknown to the public, pimping for their Tibetan lamas is a common task for many devoted Western students inside their communities or sanghas.
Mary is even more explicit about her experiences in her short memoir about Sogyal, written anonymously, about her days in his Rigpa community entitled: “Behind the Thangkas,”
This would have been the better book and more helpful to the younger generation who will, sadly, be fooled by Tibetan “Buddhism” as so many before them have been by this book about David Bowie and his early days at Samye Ling. Sadly, because Mary was almost a feminist voice for the many women abused by this Tibetan lama and so many others like him–a feminist voice with experience of the sexual abuse inside these Tibetan Buddhists sanghas that now appears forever silenced. The lamas have been silencing their women for hundreds of years. They don’t have to put them in burqas–they just have to control their minds.
As Mary says, “she was going to walk away” from Tibetan Buddhism, and “never come back.” Unfortunately for her and all those she could have warned, Namkai Norbu , and his “genius” kept that from happening.
Yes, Norbu is a genius, Mary.
He made sure you didn’t write the other book, the one everyone thought was was coming- the full length book about Sogyal, his and all the other lamas’ corruptions of these exiled Tibetan gurus- their “greed” their “sexual exploitation” and their “political skullduggery, ” as you experienced it. Instead you wrote another book, a subtle marketing tool for the Tibetan lamas . Now Mary reinforces the connection between Tibetan Buddhism and David Bowie, if anyone forgot.
More importantly, the Tibetan lamas, who had to seduce Mary back into their fold, made sure she wrote this one, the one that is about keeping Tibetan lamas in a good light. In fact, Sogyal, the predator lama, that the Dalai Lama honors and protects while calling himself a”feminist” is not mentioned at all.
After all the Dalai Lama’s picture to sell Apple computers was enough to keep a halo on him and his occult “Buddhism” for decades. Connecting yourself with celebrities worked for Chogyam Trungpa here in the U.S.as well. He paired himself with Allen Ginsberg, a member of NAMBLA. Joni Mitchell even wrote Trungpa into one of her songs.
Mary’s book will now market tantric Vajrayana Buddhism –a book approved of by Namkai Norbu, who laughably pretends to his own students that he “isn’t political.” Now Tibetan “Buddhism” will be promoted to new groups of naïve westerners: the retro-hippie, retro-punk millennial, “am I a bisexual?” crowd and any nostalgic, old flower children that weren’t caught the first time around in the net of tantra like Mary, because of David Bowie.
Still, its odd that Mary doesn’t refer to Chogyam Trungpa when she writes about Samye Ling in her book–where Bowie first found his occult Tibetan Buddhism and surely found Chogyam Trungpa.
Trungpa was the head abbot at Samye Ling , the first tantric center of “crazy wisdom” in the West, where David Bowie found Trungpa.
But Trungpa isn’t mentioned. How strange.
Perhaps it’s because of what the lamas know about Trungpa, and his chaotic tantric storm cloud that gathered and poured down so much confusion on the West, from which it has never recovered.
The drug and rock and roll scene that Trungpa gathered at Samye Ling when Westerners were being first programmed to hate their own civilization, was the perfect vehicle to introduce, by stealth, the playground for his “enlightened dictatorship. ” In Tibetan Buddhism “anything goes” if it creates chaos and confusion in your host countries to eventually tame them and then control them.
After the ‘shock and awe” period that may take a few generations, because Tibetan Buddhist is a program of its own in “shock and awe.” Trungpa had come to the West to create a monarchy of God Kings, like himself. Asians with dreams of world empire, who always take the long view –they are not taught to be in a rush, like us.
Studying the “Art of War” inside and out, like Trungpa taught his military arm to do. Trungpa believed in “soft power” to create a civilization jihad by stealth. “Infiltrate” he eventually told us– after he first getting us in his tantric net. “Clean up your act”, “dress in suits and ties,” “cut your hair.” “Go forth and spread the word.” Trungpa’s students have never stopped recruiting and propagandizing for their first guru and the vows they took to “create his world.”
Pairing up with Allen Ginsberg and Joni Mitchell and other rock and roll stars in California and their drug scene, particularly the groupies, didn’t hurt either. These folks all became Trungpa’s first idiots utiles, in marketing him and helping him to cast his first net over a critical mass of our generation. Just as David Bowie was such a useful marketing tool to confuse a whole generation of trust-fund Brits in the late sixties…. so why not use him again? For a new group of star-struck groupies? David Bowie might have come out of his Tibetan Lama phase but not so for many of his groupies. That appears much harder for them.
Trungpa was acting openly about Tibetan Buddhism’s institutional , sexual exploitation of women ( and men) for all the public to see. The other lamas hated him for that. That is probably why Namkai Norbu, Mary’s new guru to obey, made sure she left Trungpa out of the book. Guru-worshipers always obey their lamas and Trungpa, you see, was unabashedly revealing the truth about Tibetan Buddhism and its medieval, misogynistic, androcentric Lamaism , which so much of the rest of it he seemed to dislike. He didn’t really like the hierarchy of Lamaism. Except for its medieval sexual practices and the confusion it can create in a group if you are a little tyrant tulku who wants to completely control others with your narcissistic, apocalyptic plans–plans shared by every other Tibetan lama on the planet earth while they fool everyone with their many Westernized masks.
Trungpa unabashedly proclaimed North America as his land to conquer. Having more wit and a sense of humor, that none of these other lamas do, he couldn’t help but make a caricature of the British nobility combined with Asian totalitarian ambitions with his “Shambhala Court” at the end.
At least that’s what I want to imagine, when I slip back into thought- controlled vestiges buried deep in the recesses of my mind. I find myself still wanting to excuse him for the mess that he created. “Maybe”, I ponder, “that’s why he drank himself to death.”
It’s hard for ex-Tibetan Buddhists to not knee-jerk excuses for their first guru.
Sometimes, in my much less frequent, nostalgic moments, thinking about Trungpa, I believe he might have been torn about what he was doing in the West and to us. He was always warning us about what he was really up to- ” Nothing is going to save you” he said and “don’t believe in anything without first checking it out, not even me”.
His pet peeve with Westerners was their tendency toward “idiot compassion.” Now the fruition of the progressive set and their dangerous idealism, with their malas and meditation, have brought a “pathological altruism” to a level of insanity, putting us all in harms’ way . “Compassion without wisdom” is idiotic, and “peace, love and light ” is for the “very spiritual naive.” That is what Trungpa was always telling us. You could say, without any exaggeration, those were Trungpa’s constant themes.
Then Trungpa’s notorious regent, Thomas Rich, got AIDS, and he and Trungpa kept it a secret while their inner circle of guru-worshiping Western cult members, obligingly still pimped to find him his homosexual partners, long after the cause of the spread of this deadly disease was well-known. That is how stupid Westerners become inside these Tibetan Buddhist sanghas, taught that “facts don’t exist” and ” there is no right or wrong.” This caused the death of at least one of his young male students. Too serious, too awful, for even the distracted United States to completely forget. It’s there in our collective unconscious, always ready to rear its ugly head. Even the Tibetan lamas know this behavior is hard to excuse.
So Trungpa is left out of Mary’s book about Bowie, even though that was the major influence in his life regarding Tibetan “Buddhism” Lamas since him, following in his footsteps, have helped the West hate itself for three generations now. Millennials should start reading the real history of Tibet like their mothers and fathers never bothered to do. There is a chance they are seeing through all this “love and light” that is pushing us over a cliff.
Anyway, what Mary leaves out of her blog post in 2013, under “Controversy” is that Namkai Norbu , her new guru, was in the middle of the celebrity lamas who all circled wagons around Sogyal the abuser, when the CBC documentary in Canada aired. Even though Norbu tells all his students not to be “political” he was engaged in the political cover-up of the decade with the other celebrity Tibetan lamas. For Tibetan lamas not to be political is like not breathing. They only say that “non-political” stuff for their students so their students won’t pay attention to how political the lamas are.
So this endorsement, protection and therefore enabling of Sogyal the predator, by her new Tibetan teacher, Norbu, was happening at the same time that Mary was attempting so hard to expose Sogyal abuses and get someone to listen .
Namkai Norbu wrote a glowing letter of endorsement for Sogyal in the summer of 2011, right after the documentary film was released. He had a picture taken of the two lamas together, him and Sogyal, glad-handing and arm hugging for the camera. Both the letter and picture were immediately put up on Sogyal’s “Rigpa” website as if to say: “See! it has to be lies because your gurus all love Sogyal, the money-making lama from Lakar! ” All the lamas were panicking, knowing how dangerous this film about Sogyal was to them if their own Western students got a whiff of something spoiling their meditation cloud.
Mary also seems oblivious to the fact that Norbu, her new Tibetan teacher, would not appreciate her “one woman activism” at all. He had come out officially in his own sangha against “feminism” explicitly, wrote about it in his published talks for his sangha, and had hounded Tsultrim Allione, a female Tibetan teacher, into ‘heretic land” along with the rest of the Lama mafia who compelled her into silence with the threat of excommunication and hell realms from the Lama cartel for trying to expose the sexual abuse of these high Tibetan lamas. She, too, was completely silenced – with a hat of her own and a throne.
Norbu had actually declared that “feminism and Dzogchen” the latter his specialty Buddhist practice, could never be compatible. The two were not possible to do together. He wrote these anti-feminist screeds as he was bad mouthing feminists like Ms. Allione. He made it quite clear that you couldn’t be a feminist and a Dzogchen practitioner at the same time. I bring this up, because Mary does mention Norbu and “Dzogchen” as a marketing pitch for her new lama.
Interestingly, Mary can still refer to herself as a ‘feminist’ in the same breath as being a “Dzogchen student of Norbu” without the predictable Norbu condemnation. May I suggest what changed is that the Tibetan Lamas have taken up one of their many politically- correct masks,, the one labelled “feminism” among their marketing props.
This mask was specially created to fool all Western women into believing that the Tibetan lamas are feminist activists, too. That’s why the Dalai Lama said, “I am a feminist, while he and his diaspora of exiled Tibetan lamas turn everything they touch into chaos to help undermine our Western culture that differentiates us from eleventh century medieval rule and a priestly patriarchy of gurus and their misogynistic teachings that negates female energy except for birthing their tulkus and being their sexual consorts to help them reach enlightenment, not something they believe women can do in those female bodies.
Just like in Old Tibet. That’s what they want to create all over the world. They are all stuck in Tibet circa 1130 A.D. , while only physically here on their thrones. They teach Westerners, that are foolish enough to walk into their trap, to mouth empty, double talk just like them, repeating the words the lamas have learned from the West like: “compassion,” “feminism” “peace” and “equality” and even “ecology,” too. They manage to create Western “empty vessels,” that’s what they told us all to become, detached from family, children and stable relations – that’s all there in Mary’s book , too; the children who had to adapt to a topsy-turvy lifestyle while Mary was pursuing “enlightenment” and David Bowie. Middle class values that are Western values -they were the first things that had to go, when following the Tibetan Lamas.
Guru worshipers like Mary are only focused on two things: promoting their gurus and adoring their gurus and , of course making lots of money with popular books about Tibetan Buddhism being seen in good light, so they can give lots of this money to their gurus. Aren’t these Tibetan gurus clever? Killing two birds with one stone? The goal of all Tibetan lamas is to make us their slaves, and if not that, at least not pay attention to their behaviors and beliefs that are anathema to our ideas of freedom, equality and democratic principles. They do this by making us believe they are helping to make us free and are bringing the keys to “happiness and peace.” It’s their greatest and most clever “bait and switch.” That way we will let our own Western culture, values and ethics slip away. Inside a medieval dream.
Now Mary, like the few Western Tibetan Buddhists feminists before her – I can count them on one hand and not use all my fingers- those who have tried to speak out and get the Western world to wake up and listen- is never going to speak a negative word again, at least not about her Tibetan masters, her gurus and their abuses. That’s what always happens when the lamas fold someone back into their tantric net. Tantra actually means “net.”
Mary’s lips are now sealed forever. Norbu, and his Dzogchen trick up his sleeve, made sure that happened. Mary is probably never going to be allowed to walk away.
Not with what Mary knows.
.They “got cha ” Mary.
These clever lamas .
They almost always do.
Particularly the flower children that want to still live in the twenty-something world of their old rock and roll glory days. After all, it is the dream world that your new teacher, Norbu, has always said is what is “really true.”
Christine A. Chandler, M.A., C.A.G.S.
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited.